Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing finest practices and issues


Amazon Redshift is a quick, absolutely managed cloud knowledge warehouse that makes it easy and cost-effective to investigate all of your knowledge utilizing customary SQL and your present enterprise intelligence (BI) instruments. Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing permits for a safe and straightforward option to share dwell knowledge for studying throughout Amazon Redshift clusters. It permits an Amazon Redshift producer cluster to share objects with a number of Amazon Redshift client clusters for learn functions with out having to repeat the information. With this strategy, workloads remoted to completely different clusters can share and collaborate often on knowledge to drive innovation and provide value-added analytic providers to your inner and exterior stakeholders. You possibly can share knowledge at many ranges, together with databases, schemas, tables, views, columns, and user-defined SQL features, to offer fine-grained entry controls that may be tailor-made for various customers and companies that every one want entry to Amazon Redshift knowledge. The characteristic itself is straightforward to use and combine into present BI instruments.

On this publish, we talk about Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing, together with some finest practices and issues.

How does Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing work ?

  • To realize finest at school efficiency Amazon Redshift client clusters cache and incrementally replace block degree knowledge (allow us to check with this as block metadata) of objects which might be queried, from the producer cluster (this works even when cluster is paused).
  • The time taken for caching block metadata will depend on the speed of the information change on the producer because the respective object(s) have been final queried on the buyer. (As of right now the buyer clusters solely replace their metadata cache for an object solely on demand i.e. when queried)
  • If there are frequent DDL operations, the buyer is pressured to re-cache the total block metadata for an object in the course of the subsequent entry to keep up consistency as to allow dwell sharing as construction modifications on the producer invalidate all the present metadata cache on the customers.
  • As soon as the buyer has the block metadata in sync with the newest state of an object on the producer that’s when the question would execute as another common question (question referring to native objects).

Now that we’ve got the required background on knowledge sharing and the way it works, let’s have a look at just a few finest practices throughout streams that may assist enhance workloads whereas utilizing knowledge sharing.


On this part, we share some finest practices for safety when utilizing Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing.

Use INCLUDE NEW cautiously

INCLUDE NEW is a really helpful setting whereas including a schema to an information share (ALTER DATASHARE). If set to TRUE, this routinely provides all of the objects created sooner or later within the specified schema to the information share routinely. This won’t be ultimate in instances the place you need to have fine-grained management on objects being shared. In these instances, depart the setting at its default of FALSE.

Use views to attain fine-grained entry management

To realize fine-grained entry management for knowledge sharing, you’ll be able to create late-binding views or materialized views on shared objects on the buyer, after which share the entry to those views to customers on client cluster, as a substitute of giving full entry on the unique shared objects. This comes with its personal set of issues, which we clarify later on this publish.

Audit knowledge share utilization and modifications

Amazon Redshift supplies an environment friendly option to audit all of the exercise and modifications with respect to an information share utilizing system views. We are able to use the next views to examine these particulars:


On this part, we talk about finest practices associated to efficiency.

Materialized views in knowledge sharing environments

Materialized views (MVs) present a strong path to precompute complicated aggregations to be used instances the place excessive throughput is required, and you may immediately share a materialized view object through knowledge sharing as properly.

For materialized views constructed on tables the place there are frequent write operations, it’s ultimate to create the materialized view object on the producer itself and share the view. This methodology provides us the chance to centralize the administration of the view on the producer cluster itself.

For slowly altering knowledge tables, you’ll be able to share the desk objects immediately and construct the materialized view on the shared objects immediately on the buyer. This methodology provides us the pliability of making a custom-made view of information on every client in line with your use case.

This might help optimize the block metadata obtain and caching instances within the knowledge sharing question lifecycle. This additionally helps in materialized view refreshes as a result of, as of this writing, Redshift doesn’t assist incremental refresh for MVs constructed on shared objects.

Elements to think about when utilizing cross-Area knowledge sharing

Information sharing is supported even when the producer and client are in several Areas. There are just a few variations we have to think about whereas implementing a share throughout Areas:

  • Shopper knowledge reads are charged at $5/TB for cross area knowledge shares, Information sharing inside the identical Area is free. For extra data, check with Managing price management for cross-Area knowledge sharing.
  • Efficiency will even differ when in comparison with a uni-Regional knowledge share as a result of the block metadata trade and knowledge switch course of between the cross-Regional shared clusters will take extra time attributable to community throughput.

Metadata entry

There are lots of system views that assist with fetching the listing of shared objects a person has entry to. A few of these embrace all of the objects from the database that you simply’re presently linked to, together with objects from all the opposite databases that you’ve got entry to on the cluster, together with exterior objects. The views are as follows:

We recommend utilizing very restrictive filtering whereas querying these views as a result of a easy choose * will end in a whole catalog learn, which isn’t ultimate. For instance, take the next question:

choose * from svv_all_tables;

This question will attempt to acquire metadata for all of the shared and native objects, making it very heavy by way of metadata scans, particularly for shared objects.

The next is a greater question for reaching an analogous end result:

SELECT table_name,
data_type FROM svv_all_tables WHERE table_name = < tablename > AND schema_name = < schemaname > AND database_name = < databasename > ORDER BY ordinal_position

It is a good observe to comply with for all metadata views and tables; doing so permits seamless integration into a number of instruments. You can even use the SVV_DATASHARE* system views to completely see shared object-related data.

Producer/client dependencies

On this part, we talk about the dependencies between the producer and client.

Affect of the buyer on the producer

Queries on the buyer cluster can have no influence by way of efficiency or exercise on the producer cluster. This is the reason we will obtain true workload isolation utilizing knowledge sharing.

Encrypted producers and customers

Information sharing seamlessly integrates even when each the producer and the buyer are encrypted utilizing completely different AWS Key Administration Service (AWS KMS) keys. There are refined, extremely safe key trade protocols to facilitate this so that you don’t have to fret about encryption at relaxation and different compliance dependencies. The one factor to verify is that each the producer and client are in a homogeneous encryption configuration.

Information visibility and consistency

An information sharing question on the buyer can’t influence the transaction semantics on the producer. All of the queries involving shared objects on the buyer cluster comply with read-committed transaction consistency whereas checking for seen knowledge for that transaction.


If there’s a scheduled guide VACUUM operation in use for upkeep actions on the producer cluster on shared objects, it’s best to use VACUUM recluster every time doable. That is particularly necessary for giant objects as a result of it has optimizations by way of the variety of knowledge blocks the utility interacts with, which leads to much less block metadata churn in comparison with a full vacuum. This advantages the information sharing workloads by decreasing the block metadata sync instances.


On this part, we talk about further add-on options for knowledge sharing in Amazon Redshift.

Actual-time knowledge analytics utilizing Amazon Redshift streaming knowledge

Amazon Redshift lately introduced the preview for streaming ingestion utilizing Amazon Kinesis Information Streams. This eliminates the necessity for staging the information and helps obtain low-latency knowledge entry. The information generated through streaming on the Amazon Redshift cluster is uncovered utilizing a materialized view. You possibly can share this as another materialized view through an information share and use it to arrange low-latency shared knowledge entry throughout clusters in minutes.

Amazon Redshift concurrency scaling to enhance throughput

Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing queries can make the most of concurrency scaling to enhance the general throughput of the cluster. You possibly can allow concurrency scaling on the buyer cluster for queues the place you anticipate a heavy workload to enhance the general throughput when the cluster is experiencing heavy load.

For extra details about concurrency scaling, check with Information sharing issues in Amazon Redshift.

Amazon Redshift Serverless

Amazon Redshift Serverless clusters are prepared for knowledge sharing out of the field. A serverless cluster may also act as a producer or a client for a provisioned cluster. The next are the supported permutations with Redshift Serverless:

  • Serverless (producer) and provisioned (client)
  • Serverless (producer) and serverless (client)
  • Serverless (client) and provisioned (producer)


Amazon Redshift knowledge sharing provides you the power to fan out and scale complicated workloads with out worrying about workload isolation. Nevertheless, like several system, not having the proper optimization methods in place may pose complicated challenges in the long run because the methods develop in scale. Incorporating one of the best practices listed on this publish presents a option to mitigate potential efficiency bottlenecks proactively in numerous areas.

Attempt knowledge sharing right now to unlock the total potential of Amazon Redshift, and please don’t hesitate to attain out to us in case of additional questions or clarifications.

In regards to the authors

BP Yau is a Sr Product Supervisor at AWS. He’s enthusiastic about serving to prospects architect massive knowledge options to course of knowledge at scale. Earlier than AWS, he helped Provide Chain Optimization Applied sciences migrate its Oracle knowledge warehouse to Amazon Redshift and construct its subsequent technology massive knowledge analytics platform utilizing AWS applied sciences.

Sai Teja Boddapati is a Database Engineer based mostly out of Seattle. He works on fixing complicated database issues to contribute to constructing essentially the most person pleasant knowledge warehouse obtainable. In his spare time, he loves travelling, taking part in video games and watching films & documentaries.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *